top of page

The 4th Court rules that changing the vinyl on a billboard sign doesn’t constitute a “mo

Writer's picture: Michael RitterMichael Ritter

At issue in this appeal was whether changing the vinyl on a billboard sign constitutes a “modification” to a real property improvement under chapter 95 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Because the undisputed facts as depicted in this appellate record do not show that the billboard sign was “modified,” the 4th Court concluded that chapter 95 does not apply. Therefore, the court reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded for further proceedings.

6 views0 comments

Комментарии


  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

© Michael J. Ritter

DISCLAIMER

The information provided on this blog is not legal advice, and is only general information.  Due to the timing of publishing blogs and the ever changing nature of the law, depending on the time you are reading a post, the information may not be the up-to-date legal information. Please see an attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.  No reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this blog without first seeking legal advice from an attorney in the relevant jurisdiction and subject matter. Access to this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the reader.

bottom of page