top of page

San Antonio appeals court rules plaintiffs' attorney not a "consumer" under Texas DTPA

Writer's picture: Michael RitterMichael Ritter


The San Antonio court of appeals recently held that a plaintiffs' attorney was, under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA), not a "consumer" of court reporting services secured by defense counsel for depositions of the individuals plaintiffs in a suit in federal court.


Defense counsel retained the court reporting services of Kim Tindall & Associates (KTA) for the defense's deposition of the plaintiffs. In state court, the plaintiffs' attorney sued the court reporting service, KTA, under the DTPA, alleging KTA didn't provide copies of the plaintiffs' deposition and misstated the availability of the deposition transcripts for review. The 4th Court held that, under these circumstances, the plaintiffs' attorney was not a "consumer" under the DTPA.


Read the full opinion here.



126 views0 comments

Comments


  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

© Michael J. Ritter

DISCLAIMER

The information provided on this blog is not legal advice, and is only general information.  Due to the timing of publishing blogs and the ever changing nature of the law, depending on the time you are reading a post, the information may not be the up-to-date legal information. Please see an attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.  No reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this blog without first seeking legal advice from an attorney in the relevant jurisdiction and subject matter. Access to this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the reader.

bottom of page